Feasibility study
Should this CBG idea become a plant, and on what evidence?
CBG consultancy
A CBG project needs feedstock evidence, a technology hypothesis, a commercial model and a regulatory path. Saimona provides that work as a distinct service — including for sponsors who will later tender execution separately.
Technical
Feedstock characterisation
Quantity, seasonality, moisture, contaminants and collection logic — written down before a reactor is named.
Site and utilities assessment
Land, water, power, access and neighbouring uses, so the process is not designed for a site that cannot host it.
Digestion and upgrading options
A shortlist of reactor and upgrading routes against solids, gas quality and offtake specification — not a single preferred OEM.
Study-level mass and energy balance
Enough process arithmetic to test whether the idea closes, without pretending it is detailed engineering.
Specification implications
What IS 16087, PESO, pollution-control and offtake rules mean for this site — as a path, not as a slogan.
Commercial
Feasibility studies
Technical and commercial tests of whether the project can be designed, permitted and financed.
DPR support
Documentation a board or lender can read, aligned with the same feedstock and offtake story used in design.
Technology partner shortlist
Who can supply digestion, cleaning, upgrading and compression for this feed — with reasons, not a logo wall.
Offtake options
OMC cascade, industrial use or CGD injection as real options, including what SATAT does and does not guarantee.
Digestate and sequencing
A buyer or disposal path for slurry, and a decision sequence so studies happen in the right order.
Services
Each line is a described service, not a slogan. Strike any item Saimona does not offer before launch.
Should this CBG idea become a plant, and on what evidence?
What can actually be collected, stored and digested through the year?
Which digestion, cleaning and upgrading routes fit this feed and specification?
Can this land, water and grid host the process you have in mind?
The order of studies, partners, approvals and capital gates.
A written project that a financier or board can interrogate.
Independent process and partner advice without a forced equipment sale.
Costs, offtake and whether the numbers survive a sceptical reading.
Moving a concept to execution-readiness with the sponsor.
Shortlisting manufacturing and technology partners against the brief.
Keeping contractors and equipment partners inside one sequence.
Discipline across studies, procurement and site — as scoped.
A mapped path through the approvals the plant will actually need.
How the plant is meant to be run after handover, if that support is contracted.
Project enquiry
If the plant is still a hypothesis, a study is the correct first purchase. Share feedstock, location and what you need to decide — we will discuss a consultancy path before anyone freezes a flowsheet.